Saturday, January 29, 2011

Workshop Schedule: Round 2

Feb. 1
  • Stephen Rosemire
  • Claron Haden
  • Jen Derrick

Feb. 3
  • Patrick Abdallah
  • Livia Dilts
  • Katlyn Niehaus 

Feb. 8
  • Sammy Vance
  • Tony Schlachter
  • Adam Bradley

Feb. 10
  • Maggie Abney
  • Morgan Anderson
  • Amanda Vandermolen

Feb. 15
  • Amanda Staples
  • Anne Flavin
  • Mike Jones 

Feb. 17
  • Adam Wulfmeyer
  • Nicholas White
  • Alex Baer

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Writing Prompt #3: I, Incrementally

Chuck Close, Maggie (1996)
Because we're all narcissists at heart, there's often no topic we'd rather write about than ourselves, and I'd like you to indulge that instinct for this writing prompt.  Specifically, I'd like you to write a self-portrait poem, but in a way that you're not necessarily going to be inclined to write that poem.

I'd like you to build your self-portrait in a fragmented fashion, working in that geometric field method we talked about in last Thursday's class — presenting discrete, disconnected images, ideas, bits of speech, etc. that delineate a larger abstract field and leave many if not all of the connections between the points unstated, so that it's up to the reader to make those intuitive leaps, bring it all together and make sense out of it.  Working with that idea, I'm making the suggestion that you work humbly, concretely, mundanely, multifariously: don't write about your greatest achievements, your deepest convictions, the existential dramas that keep you away at night, but rather take the simple everyday matter of your life and present it in a way that illuminates it for both you and your readers.

What exactly might that look like?  How's about a catalogue of the contents of your pockets, or a list of the clothes you're wearing from head to toe, or three things you overheard while going about your business today, or a list of boring secrets, or twelve memories conjured up by browsing through old photos on your computer, or a conglomeration of disconnected items that embody qualities you possess, or four places you'd like to go, or the various things that the keys on your keychain unlock, or explanations for all of your scars, or the last five books you read, or the haircut you'd like to get next, or the piece of jewelry you most treasure, or what you'd buy your best friends if money was no option, or what you'd grab first if your house was on fire, or things the bus driver would say about you, and so forth.

Don't just choose one of these, but rather pick a few and run them together, or invent some of your own.  Some of these are more personal than others, some more oblique, and hopefully you'll find a good mix of the two.  Your finished poem should say a lot about you, but not be obvious or straightforward.  Remember fragmentation, collage, juxtaposition are key ideas here, so break your poem up into parts, make them clash with one another, make it say something about you that you've never said before.

Oh, and one final challenge (though this one is tough, so feel free to disregard if you're so inclined) — write your poem without using the pronoun "I."

If you can write something for this prompt by Thursday's class, that's great, and please post it to the thread on Blackboard — we should have some extra time to discuss your experience of working with this prompt then — and if that's too short notice, then this prompt will perhaps be useful in getting poems together for your next workshop.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Film Screenings Tonight and Next Tuesday



















As I mentioned in class today, I'll be screening two Beat Generation documentaries tonight and next Tuesday night. 

First up is Chuck Workman's critically-acclaimed documentary, The Source, a really fantastic introduction to the Beats, beautifully edited with a marvelous soundtrack (Sonic Youth, the Rolling Stones, Charlie Parker, etc.) that does a wonderful job of rooting the Beats in their historical contexts.

Next week, I'll be showing Richard Lerner & Lewis MacAdams' 1986 documentary, What Happened to Kerouac?.

Both films will be shown in McMicken 046, and I have the room reserved from 5:00-7:00.  We might start a little after 5:00 so students from the Countercultural Literature course, which ends at 4:45, can go grab a bite to eat, and feel free to bring dinner as well. 

Friday, January 21, 2011

Lead Reviewers Needed

We're closing in on the end of our first round of workshops, and since Anne volunteered to go on Tuesday, and we have two students who were absent last class, that leaves us with four people to go.  I've divided them up alphabetically, putting Alex on Tuesday and the remaining three on Thursday.

However, we still need lead reviewers for Anne, Alex, Mike, Katlyn and Amanda V.  If you haven't yet served as a lead reviewer, please sign up for one of these workshops by adding a comment to the appropriate threads.

This week's hiccups notwithstanding, we should still be on track for a slightly gentler schedule of 3 workshops per class for the rest of the term provided we make it through next week as planned, the weather behaves, and we don't continue to have issues with absences.  That's a big if, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Writing Prompt #2: Microforms

Here's a good small exercise to practice while you're drifting off to sleep at night or waiting at a red light.  Inspired by Jen's comment that she can't even write a haiku, I thought it might be useful to share Jack Kerouac's notion of the "American Haiku":
The American Haiku is not exactly the Japanese Haiku. The Japanese Haiku is strictly disciplined to seventeen syllables but since the language structure is different I don't think American Haikus (short three-line poems intended to be completely packed with Void of Whole) should worry about syllables because American speech is something again...bursting to pop.

Above all, a Haiku must be very simple and free of all poetic trickery and make a little picture and yet be as airy and graceful as a Vivaldi Pastorella.

Thus, for Kerouac, the haiku becomes a sort of Zen snapshot, a momentary glimpse of one discreet moment in life's big hustle and bustle. You can read some examples of his work in this form here, or listen to a ten-minute selection with musical accompaniment by tenor saxmen Al Cohn and Zoot Sims below:




The specificity, the vibrancy of image and/or idea that these tiny poems aim to achieve, is something that we want to be present in our work in general, and if you practice by working on these tiny little gems on their own, you'll be more capable of working a similarly powerful line or stanza or thought into your longer poems.  So write at least one for Thursday's class and bring a copy, because if we have time at the end of class, we'll do a quick round-robin reading.

Here are a few other examples of micro-poems:
  • Ted Berrigan's "Remembered Poem" [link]
  • John Ashbery's "The Cathedral Is" [link]
  • Ron Padgett's "December" [link]
  • Richard Brautigan's "Haiku Ambulance" [link]

Another possibility is to work a number of these fragmented pieces together into a longer collage piece, sometimes organized thematically, other times not.  Here are a few examples:
  • Ted Berrigan's "Rusty Nails" [link]
  • Kenneth Koch's "In Bed" (excerpt, scroll down) [link]

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Workshop Candidates Needed

Since we didn't have any additional volunteers to be workshopped during Thursday's class, we now find ourselves in a bit of a dilemma concerning turnaround for this coming Thursday, therefore, I need four (4) volunteers with poems ready who can be workshopped on Thursday and four (4) volunteers to be lead reviewers for those people.  Feel free to e-mail me in advance of tomorrow's class to volunteer for either one or both roles and if I don't have willing participants, then unfortunately I'll have to start picking randomly.  As always, write me at hennessey.michael@gmail.com to sign up.

If UC is closed due to snow on Tuesday, then our 3 poets set for Tuesday will go first on Thursday with one additional workshop (the first volunteer I hear from) and we'll move forward with 4 workshops in both of next week's classes to help us catch up.  I fear that this might be the case (my gut tells me that Greg Hand will cancel classes starting at noon), but if so, then our schedules are flexible enough to absorb the extra workshops.

I've been enjoying reading through everyone's questionnaires and prompt poems and will look forward to talking about both when next we meet.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Writing Prompt #1: Music Obsessive / Playlist Poems

To get you started, here are two related writing prompts: feel free to write to both, but be sure to write at least one poem in this mode and post it to the appropriate forum on Blackboard no later than 9am next Tuesday:

1. Music Obsessive: Ever since I was young, I've been a rabid music fan and it filters into seemingly every facet of my daily existence.  While my listening habits change from time to time, one constant is my propensity to latch onto one particular song, deriving great pleasure from listening to it over and over and over again, and even years after this brief swoon, I still feel a special connection to that song.

For this prompt, I'd like you to replicate that process: choose a song that you've had a similar reaction to (or that you're currently having a similar reaction to) and listen to it over and over again — ten times, twenty times, a hundred times, keeping your notebook or a blank Word document open as you do so.  Jot down emotions, images, free associations and connections that spring to mind when you hear this song; let snippets of lyrics filter into the poem.  Can you capture qualities of the song's tone, its mood, the characteristics of different sections or instruments, in your poem?  Then go back and listen again — what can you add? what needs to be taken out?  Let your entire composition of the poem be contained by that song —if you want to return to this poem to edit it, then you need to put the song on as you do so.  Can you make a poem that effectively translates what you love about this song?  That captures the space it puts you in?  Can you construct it so that someone else who reads it is able to identify it in an instant, or would you prefer it to be more oblique? 


2. Playlist Poems: a currently popular meme asks you to answer a series of personal questions by cutting and pasting the titles of songs selected by your iTunes' random shuffle mode.  For this prompt you'll do something similar: compose a poem that consists entirely of song titles.  There's no formal restraint here, other than the source of poetic raw materials, though this sort of pastiche of borrowed language is technically a cento, a form we'll probably look at in greater depth later in the term.  You'll have to decide whether to brainstorm titles from scratch, search through your music collection for certain keywords or let the shuffle mode make the decisions for you.  Can you limit your title choices to just one band, or settle a long-standing musical rivalry (ex. the Beatles vs. the Stones)?  Do you want to tell a story or create an image?  What sort of detritus lurking in your iTunes library can you use to deconstruct this form?

Workshop Format and Responsibilities

Welcome to our poetry workshop!  I hope that the next ten weeks will be a productive and exciting time for all of us.

Given my past experience with workshops of all sorts, I've come to realize that the truest value of the time we'll spend together isn't so much the work that we'll do in and of itself — the poems we'll write, the feedback we'll give and receive — but rather the relationships that will begin here and carry on into the future, as well as the habits we'll develop, the objective self-assessment we'll learn to perform, the things we've never tried before that we'll do here because we're forced to.  Towards that end, I've tried to structure this workshop so that you'll get the most out of our limited time, but also be well-set to carry on independently after the quarter is over.

In an ideal world, this workshop would be twice as long and half as many students in it.  Because that's not the case, we'll try to do our best to ensure that everyone is able to have as many opportunities as possible to receive feedback on their work, and in addition to formal workshop time, there will be plenty of exercises for you to take part in over the course of the term, receiving more informal feedback from me as well as your classmates.

We'll have to run a tight ship in regards to scheduling this term, therefore discussions of student work will be timed and limits will be strictly enforced (though it pains me to do so).  If we keep on schedule, we should have enough time for all 20 students to have a poem workshopped for 3 periods of 15 minutes each this quarter — and with this time limit, we'll be sure to have extra time to discuss readings, exercises and our final projects, but more importantly, should school be canceled due to inclement weather (something that's been inevitable over the past few winters), we should be able to absorb those missed workshop periods without too much hassle.

It should come as no surprise to you that your final grade will be largely dependent on the quality of the work you produce this term, and here are some of the assignments that will factor into that:
  • your response to our initial workshop questionnaire
  • the three poems you present during your workshop sessions
  • the poems you present in response to our various supplemental writing prompts
  • your two close reading responses
  • your contributions to our journal database
  • your final portfolio, which will consist of 5-7 poems with revisions and a self-assessment
  • the chapbook that you'll create and distribute at the end of the quarter

Because everyone comes to our workshop at different points in his or her writing life, there's no objective standard applied when evaluating student work.  Instead, what I'll aim to measure is your openness to the workshop environment — i.e. your willingness to devote serious attention to the assignments, be self-critical and accept constructive criticism, and above all demonstrate a marked development throughout the course of the term.  Moreover, your efforts towards your own work aren't the only reason why you're here: to be a good citizen of this workshop, you'll spend almost as much energy addressing the work of your peers as you do your own.  Specifically, here are some of the things you'll need to do for your classmates:
  • you'll provide a thoughtful and constructive critique of all poems up for workshop on a given day, making use of the comments function in Word (select text, then go under Insert > Add Comment); after you add your first, a comments toolbar will appear) to add marginalia, notes, suggestions, etc. as well as writing up a more substantive response to the poem approximately one page in length.
  • you'll serve as "lead reviewer" for the workshops of three of your peers' poems — this means that you'll a) write a longer, more detailed critique of the poem being discussed (approximately twice as long as what you'll be expected to write normally) and b) start our discussion of that poem by speaking to the poem's strengths and weaknesses for 2-3 minutes.
  • you'll show up to class each day prepared to actively take part in our class discussions

Finally, a word about aesthetics: each of us is continually developing our own idiosyncratic poetics, and the diversity of our perspectives should be a strength for our workshop, however, an important part of constructive criticism is making an honest effort to understand the author's intentions and work within that context, and the same goes for form, scale, etc.  If your tastes run to the traditional side, but you're responding to the experimental work of a classmate, it's probably not the most helpful advice to casually suggest that she implement strict iambic pentameter; likewise, suggesting a long, rambling addition to a poem working in a minimalist fashion probably won't help much.  At the same time, there may be cases where you feel that radical changes are necessary, and if you can explain your convictions behind these beliefs, you may very well be doing your peer a great favor.

You'll be expected to meet the following deadlines in regards to the workshop process:
  • poems being workshopped on a Tuesday should be posted to the appropriate Blackboard forum no later than the previous Saturday
  • poems being workshopped on a Thursday should be posted to the appropriate forum no later than the previous Monday
  • your marked up copies of the workshop poems should be posted to the appropriate forum by 9:00 AM the morning of the workshop
  • poems written in response to one of the supplemental prompts should ideally be posted by the same time

Lateness in regards to any of these deadlines will negatively affect your grade.

Here are a few other important policies:

Attendance and Participation: The importance of both regular attendance and class participation cannot be understated — without both, our workshop will fall apart. In most of the classes I've taught at UC, most students have taken our collaborative work seriously and attendance hasn't been an issue.  Ideally, I'd say that you shouldn't miss any classes this term, but I understand that illness, the weather and other contingencies are likely to intervene, therefore I think that missing one or two classes (if necessary) is acceptable.  However, students who miss more than four classes will automatically fail the course.  This is one more absence than I usually permit, due to it being the winter quarter, and think for a second about what this represents: if you miss five classes out of the eighteen that we'll have after today, you'll have lost almost a third of the quarter.

Communications: because of the strengths and weaknesses of each component, we'll use a variety of methods to communicate this term.  Because I believe in open pedagogy, we'll be using this blog for the majority of our course announcements and assignments — please use the links above to subscribe via e-mail or RSS, or if you're on Blogger, "follow" this blog so that you'll be kept up to date.  Last term I experimented with using Facebook for more informal class communications and conversations and was very happy with the results, so please be sure to join this group as well (there's a link on the sidebar also).  Finally, Blackboard is really dreadful but it does offer a secure and confidential venue for easily posting documents, so we'll be making use of our class forums to share poems, critiques, etc.

Communications (2): Please make use of my posted office hours, the time before and after class,   e-mail and/or Facebook to discuss your performance in the workshop, pose questions you might have, etc. If you're having trouble making a contribution, feel that you're doing poorly, or just not getting  into the spirit of the course, it's better to ask for guidance sooner rather than later. Unofficially, you should meet with me at least once during the quarter.

Technology: In theory, technology is a wonderful thing, but in the classroom, it can be a distraction. Please make sure that your cell phone is turned off (or at the very least in silent mode) before class begins, and keep it in your bag throughout. Texting during class will not be tolerated.  Laptops may only be used by students with appropriate paperwork from Disability Services explaining its necessity—otherwise, a notebook or binder will have to suffice (even if it's terribly old-world).

Special Needs Statement: If you have any special needs related to your participation and performance in this course, please speak to me as soon as possible. In consultation with Disability Services, we can make reasonable provisions to ensure your ability to succeed in this class and meet its goals.

Evaluative Criteria

When responding to your classmates' work, the most basic questions you'll want to answer are:
  • What is the poet trying to say/accomplish here?
  • How well does her or she accomplish that?
  • What elements of the poem help or hinder these goals?
  • What elements of the poem are aesthetically or stylistically pleasing?

If you want a more detailed evaluative rubric, I'm quite fond of the method proposed by Ann Lauterbach in an interview in Daniel Kane's book, What is Poetry: Conversations with the American Avant-Garde:

DK: Is there a method or series of steps that you might recommend teachers to take in presenting "On (Open)" [a poem of Lauterbach's they'd been discussing] to high school students not so familiar with poetry?

AL: A poem is not a puzzle to be solved. A poem is an experience, an event, in and of language. It should be approached as such:
  • What kind of event happened to you when you read this poem?
  • Did you get a feeling?
  • Did you have an idea?
  • Did you get reminded of something?
  • Did you go elsewhere, away from the familiar world into another, stranger, one?
  • Did you look up words and find out new meanings, as you would ask directions in a strange city?
  • Why do you think the poet made this word choice, and not another?
  • Why do you think the line is broken here, at this word, and not at another?
  • How is a line break in a poem different from a comma or a period in a prose sentence?

Workshop Questionnaire

Please take the time to give thoughtful responses to the following questions, posting your answers to the Blackboard forum no later than noon on Sunday:
  • How long have you been writing poetry?
  • How would you describe your poetics — that is, what are you trying to accomplish in your poetry?
  • Describe your compositional process: when/why/how/where do you write?
  • What living poets have had the greatest influence on you? What dead poets? If none (or in addition to poets), what other sorts of writers/artists/musicians do you admire?
  • Have you ever been published? Do you submit your work for publication?
  • Is this your first workshop? If not, what other workshops have you been a part of (with whom, where, when)?
  • What do you hope to get out of this workshop?